4.8 Review

Determinants of public T cell responses

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 33-42

Publisher

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2012.1

Keywords

public T cell response; convergent recombination; recombinatorial biases; thymic selection

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB522200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30830092, 30921005, 91029304, 81061160512, 61174161]
  3. Sino-Swiss International Collaboration Grant [2009DFA32760]
  4. Science Planning Program of Fujian Province [2009J1010]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090121110022]
  6. Xiamen University [2011121047, 201112G018, CXB2011035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historically, sharing T cell receptors (TCRs) between individuals has been speculated to be impossible, considering the dramatic discrepancy between the potential enormity of the TCR repertoire and the limited number of T cells generated in each individual. However, public T cell response, in which multiple individuals share identical TCRs in responding to a same antigenic epitope, has been extensively observed in a variety of immune responses across many species. Public T cell responses enable individuals within a population to generate similar antigen-specific TCRs against certain ubiquitous pathogens, leading to favorable biological outcomes. However, the relatively concentrated feature of TCR repertoire may limit T cell response in a population to some other pathogens. It could be a great benefit for human health if public T cell responses can be manipulated. Therefore, the mechanistic insight of public TCR generation is important to know. Recently, high-throughput DNA sequencing has revolutionized the study of immune receptor repertoires, which allows a much better understanding of the factors that determine the overlap of TCR repertoire among individuals. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on public T-cell response and discuss future challenges in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available