3.8 Article

A functional single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human cytidine deaminase gene contributing to ara-C sensitivity

Journal

PHARMACOGENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 29-38

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200301000-00005

Keywords

cytidine deaminase; functional single-nucleotide polymorphism; yeast expression system; ara-C sensitivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the hypothesis that analyses of drug targets for polymorphism will help to establish gene-based information for the treatment of cancer patients, we investigated the functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human cytidine deaminase (HCDA) gene. The cDNAs from 52 leukaemia/lymphoma samples and 169 control blood samples were direct-sequenced and analysed for the polymorphisms. Three different polymorphisms (A79C, G208A and T435C) were identified in the coding region of the HCDA gene and displayed allelic frequencies of 20.1%, 4.3% and 70.1%, respectively. No association with susceptibility to disease was observed. A novel polymorphism, G208A produced an alanine to threonine substitution (A70T) within the conserved catalytic domain. By introduction of the polymorphic HCDA genes into the yeast CDA-null mutants, the HCDA-70T showed 40% and 32% activity of prototype for cytidine and ara-C substrates, respectively (P < 0.01). The ara-C IC50 value of the yeast transformants carrying HCDA-70T was 757 +/- 33 μmol and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that of prototype (941 +/- 58 mumol). This study demonstrated a population characterized with 208A genotype for HCDA, which potentially leads one more sensitive to ara-C treatment than prototype. Accumulation of polymorphisms in the genes responsible for drug metabolism and determination of polymorphism-induced biological variations could provide the additional therapeutic strategies in risk-stratified protocols for the treatment of childhood malignancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available