4.6 Article

Variability in clinical phenotype despite common chromosomal deletion in Smith-Magenis syndrome [del (17) (p11.2p11.2)]

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 430-434

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000095625.14160.AB

Keywords

microdeletion; homologous recombination; chromosome 17; Smith-Magenis syndrome

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P30HD024064] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [K08HD001149, P01HD039420] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000188] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR00188] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD39420, K08 HD01149, HD2406407] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This report delineates the phenotypic features in a cohort of 58 individuals with Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) and compares features of patients with the common microdeletion to those of patients with variable sized deletions, and the three previously reported patients who harbor a mutation in RAI1 (retinoic acid induced 1). Methods: From December 1990 thru September 1999, 58 persons with SMS were enrolled in a 5-day multidisciplinary clinical protocol at the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC), Texas Children's Hospital. Each patient had a cytogenetically evident deletion in 17p11.2. Results: Of the 51 patients in whom the molecular extent of the chromosomal deletion could be delineated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), 39 (approximate to76%) had the common SMS deletion. Smaller or larger deletions were seen in approximate to12% and approximate to10% of patients, respectively, and 1 patient had a complex chromosomal rearrangement including a deletion in 17p11.2. Parent of origin was determined by polymorphic marker analysis in a subset of patients: maternal approximate to43%, paternal approximate to57%. All patients had impaired cognitive and adaptive functioning and had at least one objective measure of sleep disturbance. Other common features (seen in > 50% of patients) include short stature, ophthalmological, and otolaryngological anomalies, hearing impairment, abnormal EEG, and scoliosis. Cardiac and renal anomalies were seen in approximate to45% and approximate to19% of patients, respectively. There are no statistically significant differences in the incidence of these abnormalities in patients with the common deletion compared to those patients with smaller or larger sized deletions. Conclusions: Despite a common deletion size in 76% of patients with SMS, the only constant objectively defined features among these patients are sleep disturbances, low adaptive functioning, and mental retardation. There is no pathognomonic clinical feature, no characteristic cardiovascular defect, renal anomaly, otolaryngological or ophthalmic abnormality in SMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available