4.5 Article

Reduced virulence of a hfq mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O1

Journal

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 217-228

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0882-4010(03)00149-9

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; virulence; RNA chaperone; Hfq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sm-like protein Hfq has been implicated in the regulation of sigma(S)-dependent and sigma(S)-independent genes in E. coli and in the regulation of virulence factors in both, Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus. Here, we have studied the effect of Hfq on virulence and stress response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1). We have constructed a PAO1hfq(-) mutant and a PAO1hfq-rpoS(-) double mutant to permit distinction between direct and indirect effects of Hfq. When compared to the wild-type and the rpoS(-) strains, the hfq knock out strain showed a reduced growth rate and was unable to utilize glucose as a sole carbon source. Elastase activity was 80% reduced in the hfq(-) mutant when compared to the wild-type or the rpoS(-) strain, whereas alginate production seemed to be solely affected by sigma(S). The production of catalase and pyocyanin was shown to be affected in an additive manner by both, Hfq and sigma(S). Moreover, twitching and swarming mediated by typeIV pili was shown to be impaired in the hfq mutant. When compared to PAO1 wild-type and the rpoS(-) mutant, the hfq(-) mutant decreased virulence in Galleria mellonella by a factor of 1 x 10(4) and 5 x 10(3), respectively. Likewise, when compared to wild-type, the PAO1hfq(-) mutant was significantly attenuated in virulence when administered intraperitoneally in mice. These results strongly suggest that Hfq is a global regulator of PAO1 virulence and stress response which is not exclusively due to its role in stimulating the synthesis of sigma(S). (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available