4.1 Article

Toxicity due to 2-and 13-wk inhalation exposures of rats and mice to N,N-dimethylformamide

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 365-375

Publisher

JAPAN SOC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
DOI: 10.1539/joh.45.365

Keywords

dimethylformamide; DMF; rat; mouse; liver; benchmark dose; inhalation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toxicity due to 2- and 13-wk Inhalation Exposures of Rats and Mice to N,N-Dimethylformamide: Hideki SENOH, et al. Japan Bioassay Research Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association - In order to better characterize the toxicity of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and to provide its basic toxicity data for risk assessment of workers exposed to DMF, F344 rats and BDF1 mice of both sexes were exposed by inhalation (6 h/d x 5 d/wk) to 100, 200, 400, 800 or 1,600 ppm DMF for 2 wk, and 50, 100, 200, 400 or 800 ppm DMF for 13 wk. Three male and 7 female rats died during the 2-wk exposure to 1,600 ppm DMF, but no death of the exposed rats or mice occurred under any other exposure conditions. Massive, focal and single cell necroses were observed in the liver of DMF-exposed rats and mice. The massive necrosis associated with the centrilobular fibrosis occurred at the highest exposure concentration. The single cell necrosis was associated with fragmentation of the nucleoli as well as an increased mitotic figure. The 13-wk exposures of rats and mice to DMF were characterized by increases in the relative liver weight and the incidence of the centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy as well as increased serum levels of AST, ALT, LDH, total cholesterol and phospholipid. Lower confidence limits of the benchmark dose yielding the response with a 10% extra risk (BMDL10) were determined for the relative liver weight and the incidence of hepatocellular hypertrophy of the 13-wk exposed animals. The BMDL10 resulted in 1 ppm for the increased relative liver weight of male rats and mice and 17 ppm for the hepatocellular hypertrophy of male mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available