4.8 Article

Efficient generation of hepatocyte-like cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 1233-1242

Publisher

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2009.107

Keywords

induced pluripotent stem cells; iPS; differentiation; hepatic cells; embryonic stem cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [37871]
  2. Ministry of Education [705001]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB522502, 2009CB941200, 2007CB947901]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Creative Research Groups [30421004]
  5. Chinese Science and Technology Key Project [2008zx10002-014, 2008zx10002-011, 2009ZX10004-403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are similar to embryonic stem (ES) cells, and can proliferate intensively and differentiate into a variety of cell types. However, the hepatic differentiation of human iPS cells has not yet been reported. In this report, human iPS cells were induced to differentiate into hepatic cells by a stepwise protocol. The expression of liver cell markers and liver-related functions of the human iPS cell-derived cells were monitored and compared with that of differentiated human ES cells and primary human hepatocytes. Approximately 60% of the differentiated human iPS cells at day 7 expressed hepatic markers alpha fetoprotein and Alb. The differentiated cells at day 21 exhibited liver cell functions including albumin Asecretion, glycogen synthesis, urea production and inducible cytochrome P450 activity. The expression of hepatic markers and liver-related functions of the iPS cell-derived hepatic cells were comparable to that of the human ES cell-derived hepatic cells. These results show that human iPS cells, which are similar to human ES cells, can be efficiently induced to differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available