4.7 Article

Classical scaling and intermittency in strongly stratified Boussinesq turbulence

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 775, Issue -, Pages 436-463

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.274

Keywords

homogeneous turbulence; stratified turbulence; turbulence simulation

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-12-1-0583]
  2. Army Research Laboratory under Frontier Project [FP-CFD-FY14-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classical scaling arguments of Kolmogorov, Oboukhov and Corrsin (KOC) are evaluated for turbulence strongly influenced by stable stratification. The simulations are of forced homogeneous stratified turbulence resolved on up to 8192 x 8192 x 4096 grid points with buoyancy Reynolds numbers of Re-b = 13, 48 and 220. A simulation of isotropic homogeneous turbulence with a mean scalar gradient resolved on 81923 grid points is used as a benchmark. The Prandtl number is unity. The stratified flows exhibit KOC scaling only for second-order statistics when R-eb = 220; the 4/5 law is not observed. At lower Re-b, the -5/3 slope in the spectra occurs at wavenumbers where the bottleneck effect occurs in unstratified cases, and KOC scaling is not observed in any of the structure functions. For the probability density functions (p.d.f.s) of the scalar and kinetic energy dissipation rates, the lognormal model works as well for the stratified cases with Re-b = 48 and 220 as it does for the unstratified case. For lower Re-b, the dominance of the vertical derivatives results in the p.d.f.s of the dissipation rates tending towards bimodal. The p.d.f.s of the dissipation rates locally averaged over spheres with radius in the inertial range tend towards bimodal regardless of Re-b. There is no broad scaling range, but the intermittency exponents at length scales near the Taylor length are in the range of 0.25 +/- 0.05 and 0.35 +/- 0.1 for the velocity and scalar respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available