4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Particle size distribution in sonicated high- and low-charge vermiculites

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00133-9

Keywords

particle size and shape; sonication of vermiculite; TEM; XRD; MudMaster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High- and low-charge vermiculites from Spain (Santa Olalla and Ojen) were subjected to treatment in ultrasonic liquid processor in an attempt to reveal changes in particle size, morphology, and structure ordering. Sonication caused a rise of the S-BET from the initial value below 1 m(2)/g for the raw samples to 36 and 54 m(2)/g at the final stage of processing of Santa Olalla and Ojen samples, respectively. These values, converted into equivalent spherical diameter (e.s.d.), prove that vermiculite from Ojen has finer particle size (0.042 mum) than the one from Santa Olalla (0.063 mum). The low-charge vermiculite (Ojen) suffered an important delaminating effect. Some scrolling at the borders of particles was observed after first cycle of sonication. After eight cycles, the scrolling increased, yielding triangular-shaped particles that finally converted into tubes. The high-charge vermiculite (Santa Olalla) also showed delamination, but no scrolling was observed. The effect of sonication on the crystal structure of the high-charge vermiculite is negligible. The low-charge vermiculite shows broadening and smearing of the diffraction lines. It also shows wider spectrum of thickness of domains of coherent scattering, ranging from the initial value of 0.053 mum to the final one of 0.0 19 mum, as compared to 0.041 and 0.026 mum for the high-charge vermiculite. It was proved that, contrary to grinding, sonication produces particle division without important structural damages, and that this process is dependent on a layer charge of given vermiculite. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available