4.7 Article

Differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells in an alginate scaffold

Journal

CELL PROLIFERATION
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 427-434

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00692.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of China [20070558259]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [06021343]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Alginate scaffolds are the most frequently investigated biomaterials in tissue engineering. Tissue engineering techniques that generate liver tissue have become important for treatment of a number of liver diseases and recent studies indicate that bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells. The goal of the study described here, was to examine in vitro hepatic differentiation potential of BMSCs cultured in an alginate scaffold. Materials and methods: To investigate the potential of BMSCs to differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells, we cultured BMSCs in alginate scaffolds in the presence of specific growth factors including hepatocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-4. Results: We can demonstrate that alginate scaffolds are compatible for growth of BMSCs and when cultured in alginate scaffolds for several days they display several liver-specific markers and functions. Specifically, they expressed genes encoding alpha-foetoprotein, albumin (ALB), connexin 32 and CYP7A1. In addition, these BMSCs produced both ALB and urea, expressed cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) and were capable of glycogen storage. Percentage of CK-18 positive cells, a marker of hepatocytes, was 56.7%. Conclusions: Our three-dimensional alginate scaffolds were highly biocompatible with BMSCs. Furthermore, culturing induced their differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells. Therefore, BMSCs cultured in alginate scaffolds may be applicable for hepatic tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available