4.5 Article

Development of a quantitative PCR assay for monitoring Streptococcus agalactiae colonization and tissue tropism in experimentally infected tilapia

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 229-238

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.12358

Keywords

bacterial colonization; Oreochromis niloticus; quantitative real-time PCR; Streptococcus agalactiae

Funding

  1. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAD17B00]
  2. Science and Technique Program of Government of Guangdong Province [2012A020800006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptococcus agalactiae has become one of the most important emerging pathogens in the aquaculture industry and has resulted in large economic losses for tilapia farms in China. In this study, three pairs of specific primers were designed and tested for their specificities and sensitivities in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions (qPCRs) after optimization of the annealing temperature. The primer pair IGS-s/IGS-a, which targets the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region, was finally chosen, having a detection limit of 8.6 copies of S. agalactiae DNA in a 20 mu L reaction mixture. Bacterial tissue tropism was demonstrated by qPCR in Oreochromis niloticus 5 days postinjection with a virulent S. agalactiae strain. Bacterial loads were detected at the highest level in brain, followed by moderately high levels in kidney, heart, spleen, intestines, and eye. Significantly lower bacterial loads were observed in muscle, gill and liver. In addition, significantly lower bacterial loads were observed in the brain of convalescent O. niloticus 14 days post-injection with several different S. agalactiae strains. The qPCR for the detection of S. agalactiae developed in this study provides a quantitative tool for investigating bacterial tissue tropism in infected fish, as well as for monitoring bacterial colonization in convalescent fish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available