4.7 Article

Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: The yeast proteome

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 43-50

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr025556v

Keywords

proteome; tandem mass spectrometry; LC-MS/MS; vented column; Sequest criteria

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG00041] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly complex protein mixtures can be directly analyzed after proteolysis by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In this paper, we have utilized the combination of strong cation exchange (SCX) and reversed-phase (RP) chromatography to achieve two-dimensional separation prior to MS/MS. One milligram of whole yeast protein was proteolyzed and separated by SCX chromatography (2.1 mm i.d.) with fraction collection every minute during an 80-min elution. Eighty fractions were reduced in volume and then re-injected via an autosampler in an automated fashion using a vented-column (100 mum i.d.) approach for RP-LC-MS/MS analysis. More than 162 000 MS/MS spectra were collected with 26 815 matched to yeast peptides (7537 unique pepticles). A total of 1504 yeast proteins were unambiguously identified in this single analysis. We present a comparison of this experiment with a previously published yeast proteome analysis by Yates and colleagues (Washburn, M. P.; Wolters, D.; Yates, J.R., III. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19,242-7). In addition, we report an in-depth analysis of the false-positive rates associated with peptide identification using the Sequest algorithm and a reversed yeast protein database. New criteria are proposed to decrease false-positives to less than 1% and to greatly reduce the need for manual interpretation while permitting more proteins to be identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available