4.1 Article

Evaluation of a community-based intervention to promote physical activity in youth: Lessons from active winners

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 171-182

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-17.3.171

Keywords

rural health; exercise; physical fitness; health behaviors; prevention research

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH [R01NR003634] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To test the effects of a community-based physical activity intervention designed to increase physical activity and to conduct an extensive process evaluation of the intervention. Design. Quasi-experimental. Setting. Two rural communities in South Carolina. One community received the intervention, and the other served as the comparison. Subjects. Public school students who were in fifth grade at the start of the study (558 at baseline) were eligible to participate. A total of 436 students participated over the course of the study. Intervention. The intervention included after-school and summer physical activity programs and home, school, and community components designed to increase physical activity in youth. The intervention took place over an 18-month period. Measures. Students reported after-school physical activity at three data collection points (prior to, during, and following the intervention) using the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR). They also completed a questionnaire designed to measure hypothesized psychosocial and environmental determinants of physical activity behavior The process evaluation used meeting records, documentation of program activities, interviews, focus groups, and heart rate monitoring to evaluate the planning and implementation of the intervention. Results. There were no significant differences in the physical activity variables and few significant differences in the psychosocial variables between the intervention and comparison groups. The process evaluation indicated that the after-school and summer physical activity component of the intervention was implemented as planned, but because of resource and time limitations, the home, school, and community components were not implemented as planned. Conclusions. The intervention did not have a significant effect on physical activity in the target population of children in the intervention community. This outcome is similar to that reported in other studies of community-based physical activity intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available