4.7 Article

Use of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 knockout mice demonstrates that MMP-9 activity is not absolutely required for G-CSF or Flt-3 ligand-induced hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization or engraftment

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 417-427

Publisher

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.21-4-417

Keywords

matrix metalloproteinase; G-CSF; Flt-3 ligand; cytokine-induced mobilization; engraftment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant growth factors (GFs) are used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous and allogeneic transplantation; however, little is known about the mechanism(s) critical to this process. Increased levels of serum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 are detected during mobilization by G-CSF in humans or interleukin (IL)-8 in primates and mice, suggesting a role for this molecule in mobilization. Further, antibodies to MMP-9 block IL-8-induced mobilization. To investigate the role of MMP-9, we compared G-CSF and Flt-3 ligand (Flt-3L)-induced mobilization in wildtype (WT) and MMP-9 knockout (KO) mice. The absence of MMP-9 in the KO mice was confirmed by zymography, which also revealed that serum MMP-9 levels were elevated in WT mice following G-CSF administration. We report that MMP-9 KO mice did not have impaired G-CSF- or Flt-3L-induced hematopoietic progenitor mobilization, suggesting that MMP-9 is not an absolute requirement for this process. In addition, MMPs produced by HSCs have been demonstrated to be important for their transmigration; however, we demonstrate that the engraftment of MMP-9-deficient bone marrow HSCs was not impaired in sublethally irradiated WT recipients. We conclude that while MMP-9 may play an important role in GF-induced hematopoietic progenitor mobilization and engraftment in WT animals, compensatory upregulation of enzymes with a similar activity profile to MMP-9 may obscure the impact of MMP-9 deficiency in the KO model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available