4.8 Article

Resveratrol delays age-related deterioration and mimics transcriptional aspects of dietary restriction without extending life span

Journal

CELL METABOLISM
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 157-168

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AG000368-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY011733, 2R01EY011733] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL077256, R01 HL077256] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAMS NIH HHS [P30 AR046121] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG019972, R01 AG019972-03, R01 AG028730-01A1, AG19972, AG19719, R01 AG019719, R01 AG028730] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD034089, R56 HD034089, HD034089] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NIDDK NIH HHS [SP30DK072437] Funding Source: Medline
  8. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM068072, R01 GM068072, R01 GM068072-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A small molecule that safely mimics the ability of dietary restriction (DR) to delay, age-related diseases in laboratory animals is greatly sought after. We and others have shown that resveratrol mimics effects of DR in lower organisms. In mice, we find that resveratrol induces gene, expression patterns in multiple tissues that parallel those induced by DR and every-othor-day feeding. Moreover, resveratrol-fed elderly mice show a marked reduction in signs of aging, including reduced albuminuria, decreased inflammation, and apoptosis in the vascular endothelium, increased aortic elasticity, greater motor coordination, reduced cataract formation, and preserved bone mineral density. However, mice fed a standard diet did not live longer when treated with resveratrol beginning at 12 months of age. Our findings indicate that resveratrol treatment has a range of beneficial effects in mice but does not increase the longevity of ad libitum-fed animals when started midlife.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available