3.9 Article

Mercury, cadmium, and arsenite enhance heat shock protein synthesis in chick embryos prior to embryotoxicity

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.10044

Keywords

arsenite; cadmium; mercury; chick embryo; heat shock proteins; teratogenicity; embryotoxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

yBACKGROUND: Cells respond to adverse environmental stimuli by enhancing the expression of specific genes, the products of which include a suite of proteins known as heat shock proteins (hsps), a response often attributed to cellular protection. METHODS: In this study, we characterized alterations in hsp expression in chick embryos (Hamburger-Hamilton stage 17, 72 h) exposed in ovo to arsenite (As), mercury (Hg), and cadmium (Cd), known developmental toxicants. Embryos were incubated for 2 h following exposure to 3, 10, 30, or 100 nmol metal, or for 2, 4, 12, or 24 h following treatment with 10 nmol metal. RESULTS: An enhanced de novo synthesis of 24-, 70-, and 90-kD, 70- and 90-kD, and 70-kD proteins was observed with As, Hg, and Cd treatments, respectively. These responses were transient; apparent rates of protein synthesis were maximal 2-4 h after exposure and returned to control rates by 24 h. Actinomycin D experiments demonstrated that arsenite-induced expression of these proteins is transcriptionally regulated. Immunoblotting experiments identified the 24-, 70-, and 90-kD proteins as the heat shock proteins hsp24, hsp70, and hsp90, respectively. Exposure duration-related abnormalities were noted in the neural tube with all metals and in the ganglia and somites with Cd and As. Retina, allantois, and limb defects were specific to Cd-treated embryos, and branchial arch defects were specific to As-treated embryos. CONCLUSIONS: The data support metal-induced developmental abnormalities, which are preceded by synthesis of stress proteins. Published 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available