4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Correspondence among patients' self-reports, chart records, and audio/videotapes of medical visits

Journal

HEALTH COMMUNICATION
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 393-413

Publisher

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1504_02

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1R01CA65879] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA065879] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This pilot study examined the covariation of patients' self-reports of instrumental and affective aspects of. communication during physician-patient visits with 2 other sources of data: medical chart records and audio/videotapes. Participants were 17 community-based (nonuniversity) primary-care physicians and 77 of their patients, ages 50 to 80. Patients were interviewed by telephone within I week after their medical visits: Thirty-five of these visits were audio- and videotaped. Patients were asked to report on their receipt of specific cancer screening in the previous 2 years, the occurrence of instrumental communication events during the visit (e.g., recommendations), their affect, and their visit experiences and communication with their physicians. Results showed (a) noteworthy disagreements between patients' self-reports and medical charts regarding cancer screening; (b) better agreement of patients' self-reports with videotape records than with chart records regarding physicians' recommendations; (c) accurate recognition of patients' self-reported affect, communication, and visit experiences by third-party raters of both audiotapes and videotapes; and (d) similar correlations of audio- and videotape ratings with patients' self-reports as well as substantial correlations between audio and video ratings. The implications of these findings are discussed, and recommendations are made for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available