4.7 Article

Intracellular localization of the BCL-2 family member BOK and functional implications

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 785-799

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2013.10

Keywords

apoptosis; BOK; BAX/BAK; tail-anchor; Golgi; ER

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP0033_119203]
  2. Australian NHMRC [1020363, 1016701]
  3. Leukaemia Foundation of Australia (LFA)
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP0033_119203] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family member BOK is widely expressed and resembles the multi-BH domain proteins BAX and BAK based on its amino acid sequence. The genomic region encoding BOK was reported to be frequently deleted in human cancer and it has therefore been hypothesized that BOK functions as a tumor suppressor. However, little is known about the molecular functions of BOK. We show that enforced expression of BOK activates the intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptotic pathway in BAX/BAK-proficient cells but fails to kill cells lacking both BAX and BAK or sensitize them to cytotoxic insults. Interestingly, major portions of endogenous BOK are localized to and partially inserted into the membranes of the Golgi apparatus as well as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and associated membranes. The C-terminal transmembrane domain of BOK thereby constitutes a 'tail-anchor' specific for targeting to the Golgi and ER. Overexpression of full-length BOK causes early fragmentation of ER and Golgi compartments. A role for BOK on the Golgi apparatus and the ER is supported by an abnormal response of Bok-deficient cells to the Golgi/ER stressor brefeldin A. Based on these results, we propose that major functions of BOK are exerted at the Golgi and ER membranes and that BOK induces apoptosis in a manner dependent on BAX and BAK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available