4.0 Article

Thermosensory intensity and affect throughout the perceptible range

Journal

SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 19-26

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0899022031000083807

Keywords

cool; warm; pain; somatosensory; sensation

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [K08DE000404] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS039337] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [RR10162] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDCR NIH HHS [K08-DE00404] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS39337] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermosensory system was evaluated psychophysically in 12 healthy volunteers, spanning the full range of tolerable temperatures. Subjects provided ratings of ( 1) perceived thermal intensity, ( 2) perceived pleasantness or unpleasantness, and ( 3) perceived pain intensity after placing either one hand or foot in a temperature controlled water bath. Of particular interest were the interrelationships among the three perceptual measures, and differences between heat and cold. The relationship between perceived intensity and (un) pleasantness was different for hot vs cold stimuli. Specifically, for a given perceived thermal intensity, cold stimuli were rated as less pleasant or more unpleasant than hot stimuli. Similarly, for a given pain intensity, cold stimuli were rated as more unpleasant than hot stimuli. As warm temperatures increased and as cold temperatures decreased, stimuli were perceived as being unpleasant before they were perceived as being painful. The difference in transition temperatures for unpleasantness vs pain for heat averaged 1.4 degreesC, while the same difference for cold averaged 5.6 degreesC. Thus, there was a fourfold difference in the range of unpleasant but non-painful cold vs hot temperatures. Pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings were significantly higher for heat stimuli applied to the foot vs hand. In contrast, there was no significant body site difference for pain intensity or unpleasantness ratings of cold stimuli. All of these results reveal important differences in the processing of cold vs hot stimuli. These differences could be exploited to differentiate processing relevant to discriminative vs affective components of somesthetic perception, in both the innocuous and noxious ranges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available