4.7 Article

Endoplasmic reticulum stress activates autophagy but not the proteasome in neuronal cells: implications for Alzheimer's disease

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1071-1081

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2010.176

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; unfolded protein response; ubiquitin proteasome system; autophagy

Funding

  1. Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek Nederland (ISAO) [07506]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein folding stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) may lead to activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), aimed to restore cellular homeostasis via transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. ER stress is also reported to activate the ER overload response (EOR), which activates transcription via NF-kappa B. We previously demonstrated that UPR activation is an early event in pre-tangle neurons in Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. Misfolded and unfolded proteins are degraded via the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) or autophagy. UPR activation is found in AD neurons displaying both early UPS pathology and autophagic pathology. Here we investigate whether activation of the UPR and/or EOR is employed to enhance the proteolytic capacity of neuronal cells. Expression of the immunoproteasome subunits beta 2i and beta 5i is increased in AD brain. However, expression of the proteasome subunits is not increased by the UPR or EOR. UPR activation does not relocalize the proteasome or increase overall proteasome activity. Therefore proteasomal degradation is not increased by ER stress. In contrast, UPR activation enhances autophagy and LC3 levels are increased in neurons displaying UPR activation in AD brain. Our data suggest that autophagy is the major degradational pathway following UPR activation in neuronal cells and indicate a connection between UPR activation and autophagic pathology in AD brain. Cell Death and Differentiation (2011) 18, 1071-1081; doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.176; published online 21 January 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available