4.7 Review

Apoptotic volume decrease as a geometric determinant for cell dismantling into apoptotic bodies

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 1665-1671

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2010.96

Keywords

apoptotic volume decrease; volume-to-surface ratio; apoptotic bodies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis is a mode of cell death through which cells are dismantled and cell remains are packed into small, membrane-bound, sealed vesicles called apoptotic bodies, which are easy to erase by phagocytosis by neighbouring and immune system cells. The end point of the process is to cleanly eliminate damaged or unnecessary cells without disrupting the surrounding tissue or eliciting an inflammatory response. The apoptotic process involves a series of specific events including deoxyribonucleic acid and nuclear fragmentation, protease-driven cleavage of specific substrates, which inhibits key survival functions and reorganizes the cell's structure, externalization of molecules involved in phagocytosis, membrane blebbing and cell shrinkage. Apoptotic volume decrease (AVD) leading to cell shrinkage is a core event in the course of apoptosis, the biological meaning of which has not been clearly ascertained. In this article we argue that volume loss is a geometrical requisite for cell dismantling into apoptotic bodies. This is derived from the cell's volume-to-surface ratio. Indeed, package of the original cell volume into smaller membrane-sealed vesicles requires that either cell membrane surface increase or cell volume decrease. In this sense, AVD provides a reservoir of membrane surface for apoptotic body formation. The strategic situation of AVD in the time course of apoptosis is also discussed in the context of apoptotic body formation. Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 1665-1671; doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.96; published online 13 August 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available