4.7 Article

Endosome-mitochondria juxtaposition during apoptosis induced by H. pylori VacA

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 1707-1716

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2010.42

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; VacA; apoptosis; mitochondria; BAX

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University
  2. University of Padova [CPDA074121/07]
  3. Fondazione Berlucchi
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro grant regionale
  5. European Community
  6. Telethon Italy
  7. Compagnia di San Paolo Italy
  8. AIRC Italy
  9. Electron Microscopy, Genova, Italy [GTF07002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA) is an important virulence factor of Helicobacter pylori with pleiotropic effects on mammalian cells, including the ability to trigger mitochondria-dependent apoptosis. However, the mechanism by which VacA exerts its apoptotic function is unclear. Using a genetic approach, in this study we show that killing by VacA requires the proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members BAX and BAK at the mitochondrial level, but not adequate endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ levels, similarly controlled by BAX and BAK. A combination of subcellular fractionation and imaging shows that wild-type VacA, but not mutants in its channel-forming region, induces the accumulation of BAX on endosomes and endosome-mitochondria juxtaposition that precedes the retrieval of active BAX on mitochondria. It is noteworthy that in Bax- and Bak-deficient cells, VacA is unable to cause endosome-mitochondria juxtaposition and is not retrieved in mitochondria. Thus, VacA causes BAX/BAK-dependent juxtaposition of endosomes and mitochondria early in the process of cell death, revealing a new function for these proapoptotic proteins in the regulation of relative position of organelles. Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 1707-1716; doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.42; published online 30 April 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available