4.7 Review

Adenosine signaling and function in glial cells

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1071-1082

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2009.131

Keywords

astrocyte; adenosine receptor; adenosine kinase; epilepsy; excitotoxicity; neurodegeneration

Funding

  1. NIH [NS058780, MH083973, NS061844, NS057538, NS057475, NS48995, NS41083, DA19362]
  2. CURE Foundation in collaboration with the Department of Defense
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH-071-1-0012]
  4. Swedish Science Research Council
  5. Hjarnfonden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite major advances in a variety of neuroscientific research fields, the majority of neurodegenerative and neurological diseases are poorly controlled by currently available drugs, which are largely based on a neurocentric drug design. Research from the past 5 years has established a central role of glia to determine how neurons function and, consequently, glial dysfunction is implicated in almost every neurodegenerative and neurological disease. Glial cells are key regulators of the brain's endogenous neuroprotectant and anticonvulsant adenosine. This review will summarize how glial cells contribute to adenosine homeostasis and how glial adenosine receptors affect glial function. We will then move on to discuss how glial cells interact with neurons and the vasculature, and outline new methods to study glial function. We will discuss how glial control of adenosine function affects neuronal cell death, and its implications for epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, ischemia, and Parkinson's disease. Eventually, glial adenosine-modulating drug targets might be an attractive alternative for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. There are, however, several major open questions that remain to be tackled. Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 1071-1082; doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.131; published online 18 September 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available