4.0 Article

Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous

Journal

HUMAN HEREDITY
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 56-65

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000071811

Keywords

haplotype; association; gene-environment interaction; generalized linear model

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HR-16049] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13276] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM65450, R01 GM065450] Funding Source: Medline
  4. DIVISION OF LUNG DISEASES [N01HR016049] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE013276] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM065450] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the study of complex traits, the utility of linkage analysis and single marker association tests can be limited for researchers attempting to elucidate the complex interplay between a gene and environmental covariates. For these purposes, tests of gene-environment interactions are needed. In addition, recent studies have indicated that haplotypes, which are specific combinations of nucleotides on the same chromosome, may be more suitable as the unit of analysis for statistical tests than single genetic markers. The difficulty with this approach is that, in standard laboratory genotyping, haplotypes are often not directly observable. Instead, unphased marker phenotypes are collected. In this article, we present a method for estimating and testing haplotype-environment interactions when linkage phase is potentially ambiguous. The method builds on the work of Schaid et al. [2002] and is applicable to any trait that can be placed in the generalized linear model framework. Simulations were run to illustrate the salient features of the method. addition, the method was used to test for haplotype-smoking exposure interaction with data from the Childhood Asthma Management Program. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available