4.3 Article

Antibodies to glatiramer acetate do not interfere with its biological functions and therapeutic efficacy

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 592-599

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/1352458503ms963oa

Keywords

antibodies; Copaxone (R); Copolymer 1; EAE; multiple sclerosis; non-neutralizing antibodies; therapeutic efficacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glatiramer acetate (GA) previously known as Copolymer 1 (Cop 1), a synthetic amino acid copolymer, suppresses experimental auto immune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and shows a beneficial effect in relapsing-remitting type of multiple sclerosis (MS). GA acts as a specific immunomodulator by binding to MHC C lass II molecules, inducing specific T suppressor (Ts) cells and interfering with T cell responses to myelin antigens. MS patients treated with GA developed GA reactive antibodies, which peaked at three months and decreased at six months. In order to find out whether anti-GA antibodies may neutralize the therapeutic effect of GA, we tested both polyclonal (mouse and human) and monoclonal GA specific antibodies for their ability to interfere with the biological activity of GA in several assay systems. None of the antibodies interfered with GA activities either in vitro (binding to MHC molecules and T cell stimulation) or in vivo (blocking of EAE). Furthermore, 53 samples of sera obtained from 34 MS patients that participated in the open label trial in Israel, and all developed GA specific antibodies, were tested for their ability to inhibit the proliferation response of GA specific Ts cell clone and to interfere with GA competitive inhibition of the response to peptide 84-102 of myelin basic protein (MBP). None of the sera inhibited and some even enhanced the in vitro activities of GA. Furthermore, representative MS sera with high titer of GA reactive antibodies did not neutralize the biological activities of GA and did not inhibit Th2 cytokine secretion by human GA specific clone. These results are consistent with the findings that the therapeutic effect of GA is not affected by GA reactive antibodies and is sustained upon long term treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available