4.6 Article

Chromothripsis Breakage-fusion-bridge over and over again

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 12, Issue 13, Pages 2016-2023

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.25266

Keywords

chromothripsis; breakage-fusion-bridge; chromosomal instability; centromere fission; mitosis; telomere

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion en Salud [PS09/00572]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2009-08395E, SAF2010-21205]
  3. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [S2010/BMD2502]
  4. JAE-doc fellowship from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)
  5. CSIC
  6. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acquisition of massive but localized chromosome translocations, a phenomenon termed chromothripsis, has received widespread attention since its discovery over a year ago. Until recently, chromothripsis was believed to originate from a single catastrophic event, but the molecular mechanisms leading to this event are yet to be uncovered. Because a thorough interpretation of the data are missing, the phenomenon itself has wrongly acquired the status of a mechanism used to justify many kinds of complex rearrangements. Although the assumption that all translocations in chromothripsis originate from a single event has met with criticism, satisfactory explanations for the intense but localized nature of this phenomenon are still missing. Here, we show why the data used to describe massive catastrophic rearrangements are incompatible with a model comprising a single event only and propose a molecular mechanism in which a combination of known cellular pathways accounts for chromothripsis. Instead of a single traumatic event, the protection of undamaged chromosomes by telomeres can limit repetitive breakage-fusion-bridge events to a single chromosome arm. Ultimately, common properties of chromosomal instability, such as aneuploidy and centromere fission, might establish the complex genetic pattern observed in this genomic state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available