4.6 Article

Wip1 sensitizes p53-negative tumors to apoptosis by regulating the Bax/Bcl-xL ratio

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1883-1887

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.19901

Keywords

Wip1; p53-negative; Bax; Bcl-x(L); cisplatin; NF kappa B; phosphatase; Runx2

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue Contre le Cancer Interregionale du Grand Est
  2. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  3. C. Garrido group, La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  4. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wip1 is a stress-response phosphatase that negatively regulates several tumor suppressors, including p53. In a sizeable fraction of tumors, overexpression or amplification of Wip1 compromises p53 functions; inhibition of Wip1 activity is an attractive strategy for improving treatment of these tumors. However, over half of human tumors contain mutations in the p53 gene or have lost both alleles. Recently, we observed that in cancer cells lacking wild-type p53, reduction of Wip1 expression was ineffective, whereas, surprisingly, overexpression of Wip1 increased anticancer drug sensitivity. The increased sensitivity resulted from activation of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis through increased levels of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax and decreased levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-x(L). We showed that interaction of Wip1 and the transcription factor RUNX2, specifically through dephosphorylation of RUNX2 phospho-S432, resulted in increased expression of Bax. Interestingly, overexpression of Wip1 increased drug sensitivity only in the p53-negative tumor cells while protecting the wild-type, p53-containing normal cells from drug-induced collateral injury. Here, we provide evidence that Wip1 overexpression decreases expression of Bcl-x(L) through negative regulation of NF kappa B activity. Thus, Wip1 overexpression increases the sensitivity of p53-negative cancer cells to anticancer drugs by separately affecting Bax and Bcl-x(L) protein levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available