4.6 Article

Xenografts in zebrafish embryos as a rapid functional assay for breast cancer stem-like cell identification

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages 3751-3757

Publisher

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.21.17921

Keywords

xenograft; zebrafish; breast cancer; cancer stem cells; mammosphere; curcumin

Categories

Funding

  1. Obra Social Kutxa
  2. Fundacion Medica Mutua Madrilena
  3. Gobierno Vasco [PI2010-25]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Accion Estrategica en Salud [PI2010-01035]
  5. Ministerio de Industria [IAP-580000-2008-59]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cancer stem cell is defined by its capacity to self-renew, the potential to differentiate into all cells of the tumor and the ability to proliferate and drive the expansion of the tumor. Thus, targeting these cells may provide novel anticancer treatment strategies. Breast cancer stem cells have been isolated according to surface marker expression, ability to efflux fluorescent dyes, increased activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase or the capacity to form spheres in non-adherent culture conditions. In order to test novel drugs directed toward modulating self-renewal of cancer stem cells, rapid, easy and inexpensive assays must be developed. Using 2 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish embryos as transplant recipients, we show that cells grown in mammospheres from breast carcinoma cell lines migrate to the tail of the embryo and form masses with a significantly higher frequency than parental monolayer populations. When stem-like self-renewal was targeted in the parental population by the use of the dietary supplement curcumin, cell migration and mass formation were reduced, indicating that these effects were associated with stem-like cell content. This is a proof of principle report that proposes a rapid and inexpensive assay to target in vivo cancer stem-like cells, which may be used to unravel basic cancer stem cell biology and for drug screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available