4.5 Article

Cleavage of recombinant proenkephalin and blockade mutants by prohormone convertases 1 and 2: an in vitro specificity study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 868-878

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02043.x

Keywords

MALDI-TOF peptide; PC1; PC2; proenkephalin; prohormone convertase

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA00204-10, DA05084, R01 DA005084, R56 DA005084] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R56DA005084, R01DA005084] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proenkephalin (PE) derived-peptides are thought to be generated predominantly through endoproteolytic cleavage by prohormone convertases 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). In order to compare cleavage site preferences of these convertases, we studied the processing of recombinant wild-type rat PE and of two mutant PEs by recombinant purified mouse PC1 and PC2. Western blot analyses of timed digestions showed that both mouse PC1 and PC2 were able to produce a variety of large and intermediate sized-peptides from wild-type PE as well as from the precursors mutated at initial blockade sites. PC2 exhibited a broader specificity against PE than PC1, generating a much greater number of peptide products. Mass spectrometric identification of cleavage products showed that PC2 appeared to be the principal enzyme involved in the generation of smaller active opioids. Both enzymes were able to cleave various KR- and KK-containing sites, but PC2 was also able to cleave efficiently at an RR-V site and a KK-M site not cleaved by PC1, suggesting the exclusion of large aliphatic residues at the P1' position in PC1 cleavage. Alternative cleavage sites were readily chosen by convertases in blockade mutants, confirming in vivo results that cleavages do not follow an obligatory order. Furthermore, glycosylated PE was less efficiently processed by PC2, indicating that glycosylation may serve as a mechanism to hinder processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available