4.7 Article

An adaptive optics survey of M6.0-M7.5 stars: Discovery of three very low mass binary systems including two probable hyades members

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 598, Issue 2, Pages 1265-1276

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/378935

Keywords

binaries : general; instrumentation : adaptive optics; open clusters and associations : individual (Hyades); stars : individual (LP 415-20; LP 475-855, 2MASSW J1750129+442404); stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A survey of 30 nearby M6.0-M7.5 dwarfs with K-s < 12 mag utilizing the Hokupa'a adaptive optics system at the Gemini North Telescope has discovered three new binary systems. All three systems have separations between 0.'' 12 and 0.'' 29 (3-10 AU) with similar mass ratios (q > 0.8, DeltaK(s) < 0.7). This result gives further support to the suggestion that wide (a > 20 AU), very low mass (M-tot < 0.185 M.) binary systems are exceedingly rare or perhaps even nonexistent. The semimajor axis distribution of these systems peaks at similar to 5 AU, tighter than more massive M and G binary distributions, which have a broad peak at separations of similar to 30 AU. We find a sensitivity-corrected binary fraction in the range 5(-2)(+4)% for M6.0-M7.5 stars with separations a > 3 AU. This binary frequency is less than the similar to32% measured among early M dwarfs over the same separation range. Two of the low-mass binaries are probable Hyades open cluster members based on proper motions, cluster membership probabilities, radial velocities, and near-IR photometry. LP 415-20 has the distinction of being the tightest (3.6 AU) multiple system ever spatially resolved in the cluster, and the companions of LP 415-20 and LP 475-855 are among the least massive objects ever resolved in the Hyades, with estimated masses of 0.081(-0.010)(+0.009) and 0.082(-0.009)(+0.009) M..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available