4.6 Article

Laparoscopic management of primary hyperaldosteronism: Clinical experience with 212 cases

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 1, Pages 32-35

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64028-1

Keywords

adrenal glands; laparoscopy; adrenalectomy; hyperaldosteronism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Laparoscopy is now widely used to remove benign adrenal tumors. We assessed the value of transperitoneal partial or total adrenalectomy for primary hyperaldosteronism. Materials and Methods: From September 1994 to October 2001, 212 consecutive patients with a mean age of 48 years who presented with primary hyperaldosteronism and related arterial hypertension underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (193) or tumor enucleation (20) performed by a single surgeon, including 1 who underwent bilateral adrenalectomy. In all cases preoperatively high plasma and urine aldosterone was associated with low plasma renin and hypokalemia. Results: Mean followup was 44 months. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 30 patients (14%) due to bleeding or adhesion and a procedure duration of greater than 3 hours. Mean operative time was 102 minutes (range 30 to 260). Six patients (2.8%) required blood transfusion. No deaths occurred. Postoperatively complications were observed in 10% of patients and the most frequent one was electrical myocardial ischemia without infarction. Mean postoperative pain medication was 17 mg. morphine sulfate equivalents (range 0 to 60). Mean and median hospital stay was 3.6 and 2.9 days, respectively (range 2 to 20). Postoperatively blood pressure was normal in 58% of patients without any drug, while treatment was decreased in the remainder. Kalemia was normalized in all cases. Conclusions: Although some complications can occur, mostly at the beginning of the learning curve, laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy is effective treatment for primary hyperaldosteronism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available