4.7 Article

Cycle dependency of intrauterine vascular endothelial growth factor levels is correlated with decidualization and corpus luteum function

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages 1228-1233

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02165-4

Keywords

VEGF; angiogenesis; endometrium; intrauterine microdialysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine intrauterine levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A during the menstrual cycle in the human female and to investigate the impact of decidualization and corpus luteum function. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: Tertiary university center. Patient(s): Fifty-four women with infertility problems. Intervention(s): Intrauterine concentrations of VEGF-A were determined at various time points during the secretory phase using a novel intrauterine microdialysis device. Concomitantly, intrauterine insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-1 levels served as a paracrine parameter for decidualization. Serum progesterone (P) and E-2 levels were determined as markers for corpus luteum function. Main Outcome Measure(s): Intrauterine VEGF levels. Result(s): The VEGF levels in utero were clearly cycle dependent with increasing levels during the late secretory and premenstrual phases. There was a significant correlation with the decidualization marker IGFBP-1. In contrast, intrauterine VEGF levels showed a significant negative correlation with serum E-2 and P. Conclusion(s): Intrauterine VEGF levels are regulated in a cycle-dependent way. Increasing levels in the late secretory phase are clearly correlated with decidualization. In contrast, decreasing serum levels of steroids produced by the regressing corpus luteum are less likely to be responsible for increasing VEGF levels in the premenstrual phase. (Fertil Steril(R) 2003;80:1228-33. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available