4.6 Review

Targeting mTOR with rapamycin One dose does not fit all

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 1026-1029

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.7.8044

Keywords

cancer; mTOR; phosphatidic acid; phospholipase D; rapamycin

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA046677-14A1, R01 CA046677-15, CA46677, R01 CA046677-15S1, R01 CA046677] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-03037, G12 RR003037] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06 GM060654, GM60654] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A puzzling aspect of rapamycin-based therapeutic strategies is the wide disparity in the doses needed to suppress mTOR under different circumstances. A recent study revealing mechanistically how rapamycin suppresses mTOR provides two explanations for the differential sensitivities to rapamycin. First, mTOR exists as two functionally distinct complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2), and while rapamycin suppresses both, it does so at very different concentrations. Whereas mTORC1 is suppressed by concentrations of rapamycin in the low nM range, mTORC2 generally requires low mu M concentrations. Second, the efficacy of rapamycin is dependent on the level of phosphatidic acid (PA), which is required for the assembly of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes. Rapamycin interacts with mTOR in a manner that is competitive with PA. Therefore, elevated levels of PA, which is common in cancer cells, increases the level of rapamycin needed to suppress both mTORC1 and mTORC2. A practical outcome of the recent study is that if PA levels are suppressed, mTORC2 becomes sensitive to concentrations of rapamycin that can be achieved clinically. Since mTORC2 is likely more critical for survival signals in cancer cells, the recent findings suggest new strategies for enhancing the efficacy of rapamycin-based therapeutic approaches in cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available