4.7 Article

The Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale - The development of empirically based guidelines for interpretation

Journal

CHEST
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages 2182-2191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.6.2182

Keywords

bronchitis; clinical trials; COPD; cough; dyspnea; emphysema; exacerbation; health-related quality of life; instrument; patient-reported outcome; sputum; St. George Respiratory Questionnaire; symptoms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A patient report of respiratory symptoms in COPD is essential to successfully monitoring disease, adjusting treatment, and evaluating outcomes. Objective: To develop empirically based guidelines for interpreting mean changes in symptom scores using the Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS). Methods: Analyses were performed on data from three multinational trials (n = 2,971). Mean changes in BCSS score with treatment were examined by physician and patient ratings of treatment efficacy, juxtaposed with percentage change in symptoms, statistical effect size (ES), DeltaFEV(1), and change in St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score. BCSS scores during an exacerbation were examined relative to changes in peak expiratory flow and rescue medication use. Results: Mean baseline BCSS total score was 5.2 +/- 2 (+/- SD); 90% of scores were between 2 and 9. Highly efficacious treatment (n = 257; physician rating) was associated with a DeltaBCSS total score of - 1.3 +/- 1.8, representing a 24% improvement (ES = 0.7), and corresponding to a 10% improvement in FEV1, and DeltaSGRQ score total of - 10.3 +/- 13.8. Similar changes in BCSS score were observed during recovery from an exacerbation (n 713; - 1.3 +/- 1.8). Mean change with moderately efficacious treatment (n = 965) was - 0.7 +/- 1.8, a 13% improvement (ES = 0.3) corresponding to DeltaSGRQ total score of - 6.8 +/- 12.6. Mildly efficacious treatment (n = 891) was associated with a change of 0.35, a 7% improvement (ES = 0. 18), with a DeltaFEV(1) <1% and DeltaSGRQ total score of - 2.6 +/- 11.7. Conclusions: Patient-reported daily symptom data are sensitive to change and useful for both observational studies and controlled clinical trials of patients with COPD. A mean DeltaBCSS total score > 1.0 represents substantial symptomatic improvement, changes of approximately 0.6 can he interpreted as moderate, and changes of 0.3 can be considered small.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available