4.8 Article

Fibrogenic impact of high serum glucose in chro nic hepatitis C

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1049-1055

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00456-2

Keywords

non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); hepatitis C; obesity; diabetes; liver fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: There is considerable variability in the rate of fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C, most of which is related to factors so far unknown. We tested the hypothesis that high serum glucose and overweight might contribute to this variability. Methods: Seven hundred and ten patients with chronic hepatitis C with a known duration of infection and no hepatitis B virus or human immunodeficiency virus coinfection were studied. Significant fibrosis was defined as bridging fibrosis including cirrhosis. Variables were tested for their association with significant fibrosis. Results: In univariate analyses both serum glucose and body mass index were associated with fibrosis. In multivariate analyses, age at infection, duration of infection, serum glucose and daily alcohol intake but not body mass index were independently associated with significant fibrosis. Patients with high serum glucose had been contaminated at an older age and had features of the metabolic syndrome, including steatosis more frequently, as well as faster fibrosis progression rates. High serum glucose was associated with intermediate and advanced, but not with early, fibrosis stages. A high serum glucose was associated with a higher relative risk for significant fibrosis than overweight. Conclusions: High serum glucose, is an independent co-factor of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C with a higher profibrogenic impact than overweight. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available