4.7 Article

Multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis distinguishes outbreak and sporadic Eschetichia coli O157 : H7 isolates

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 5389-5397

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5389-5397.2003

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [K24AI052788] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K24 AI052788, K24 AI52788] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a major cause of food-borne illness in the United States. Outbreak detection involves traditional epidemiological methods and routine molecular subtyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE is labor-intensive, and the results are difficult to analyze and not easily transferable between laboratories. Multilocus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) is a fast, portable method that analyzes multiple VNTR loci, which are areas of the bacterial genome that evolve quickly. Eighty isolates, including 21 isolates from five epidemiologically well-characterized outbreaks from Pennsylvania and Minnesota, were analyzed by PFGE and MLVA. Strains in PFGE clusters were defined as strains that differed by less than or equal to one band by using XbaI and the confirmatory enzyme SpeI. MLVA was performed by comparing the number of tandem repeats at seven loci. From 6 to 30 alleles were found at the seven loci, resulting in 64 MLVA types among the 80 isolates. MLVA correctly identified the isolates from all five outbreaks if only a single-locus variant was allowed. MLVA differentiated strains with unique PFGE types. Additionally, MLVA discriminated strains within PFGE-defined clusters that were not known to be part of an outbreak. In addition to being a simple and validated method for E. coli O157:H7 outbreak detection, MLVA appears to have a sensitivity equal to that of PFGE and a specificity superior to that of PFGE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available