4.6 Article

Post-extubation stridor in intensive care unit patients - Risk factors evaluation and importance of the cuff-leak

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 69-74

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1563-4

Keywords

post-extubation stridor; airway obstruction; laryngeal edema; extubation failure; cuff-leak test; helium-oxygen; unplanned extubation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-extubation stridor and to evaluate the performance of the cuff-leak test in detecting this complication. Design: Prospective, clinical investigation. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: Hundred twelve extubations were analyzed in 112 patients during a 14-month period. Intervention: A cuff-leak test before each extubation. Measurements and results: The incidence of stridor was 12%. When we chose the thresholds of 130 ml and 12% to quantify the cuff-leak volume, the sensitivity and the specificity of the test were, respectively, 85% and 95%. The patients who developed stridor had a cuff leak significantly lower than the others, expressed in absolute values (372 +/- 170 vs 59 +/- 92 ml, p < 0.001) or in relative values (56 +/- 20 vs 9 +/- 13%, p < 0.001). Stridor was associated with an elevated Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), a medical reason for admission, a traumatic or difficult intubation, a history of self-extubation, an over-inflated balloon cuff at admission to ICU and a prolonged period of intubation. These results provide a framework with which to identify patients at risk of developing a stridor after extubation. Conclusion: A low cuff-leak volume (< 130 ml or 12%) around the endotracheal tube prior to extubation is useful in identifying patients at risk for post-extubation stridor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available