4.7 Article

Measurement of human cytomegalovirus loads by quantitative real-time PCR for monitoring clinical intervention in transplant recipients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 187-191

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.187-191.2003

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative monitoring of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is helpful in determining appropriate antiviral management of transplant recipients. Quantitative PCR technologies have demonstrated accuracy in measuring systemic HCMV loads. A total of 298 consecutive whole-blood specimens submitted to the Clinical Virology Laboratory at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 15 February to 31 October 1999 were included in the study. In addition to a qualitative colorimetric microtiter plate PCR assay (MTP-PCR) and a semiquantitative pp65 antigenemia assay, each specimen was measured for HCMV loads by a quantitative PCR assay performed on an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (TaqMan). Compared to results of the MTP-PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 70.5, 97.5, 87.8, and 92.8% for the antigenemia assay and were 96.7, 92.0, 75.6, and 99.1% for the TaqMan assay, respectively. There was a high correlation between antigenemia values and HCMV loads as determined by the TaqMan (r = 0.989; P < 0.001). Antigenemia values of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 100, 101 to 1,000, and over 1,000 positive cells per 2 X 10(5) leukocytes corresponded to median HCMV loads measured by TaqMan of 125, 1,593, 5,713, 16,825, and 5,425,000 copies/ml, respectively. Corresponding to antigenemia values of 1 to 2, 10, and 50 positive cells per 2 X 10(5) leukocytes, HCMV viral loads of 1,000, 4,000, and 10,000 copies/ml are proposed as cutoff points for initiating antiviral therapy in patient groups with high, intermediate, and low risk of CMV diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available