4.7 Article

Raloxifene administration in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: effect of different BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 192-198

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg031

Keywords

bone mineral density; osteoporosis; post-menopause; raloxifene; vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism has been considered a factor influencing the effectiveness of the anti-osteoporotic treatments. The aim of this study was to correlate the effectiveness of raloxifene treatment in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis to BsmI VDR genotypes. METHODS: Between January and August 2000, 75 Italian osteoporotic women were enrolled and treated with raloxifene at a dose of 60 mg/day. At entry and after 1 year of treatment, lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), serum osteocalcin (OC) and urinary creatinine-corrected free deoxypyridinoline (DPD) levels were evaluated. DNA was extracted from blood and analysed with restriction endonuclease BsmI for VDR gene. RESULTS: After treatment, a significant increase in lumbar BMD and a significant reduction in serum OC and urinary DPD levels were observed. The percentage of change (mean +/- SD) in lumbar BMD, and in serum OC and urinary DPD levels was significantly different in homozygous bb (1.58 +/- 0.80, -5.15 +/- 2.36 and -7.71 +/- 2.89 for BMD, OC and DPD respectively) in comparison with BB (4.13 +/- 2.26, -13.59 +/- 4.68 and -15.16 +/- 4.65 for BMD, OC and DPD respectively) BsmI VDR genotypes. Heterozygous Bb VDR patients showed an intermediate percentage (mean +/- SD) of BMD, serum OC and urinary DPD change (2.49 +/- 1.54, -8.69 +/- 2.60 and -10.52 +/- 2.56 for BMD, OC and DPD respectively) not significantly different in comparison with homozygous BB and bb. CONCLUSIONS: In post-menopausal women with osteoporosis the effectiveness of raloxifene treatment on bone metabolism seems to be controlled by different BsmI VDR genotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available