3.9 Article

Projection structure of a N-terminal deletion mutant of connexin 26 channel with decreased central pore density

Journal

CELL COMMUNICATION AND ADHESION
Volume 15, Issue 1-2, Pages 85-93

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15419060802013588

Keywords

channel gating; connexin; electron crystallography; gap junctions; image processing; projection structure

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR004050] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM065937] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR004050-17, P41 RR004050-18, RR04050, P41 RR004050-16, P41 RR004050-187694, P41 RR004050, P41 RR004050-197100] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM065937-04S1, GM065937, R01 GM065937-05, R01 GM065937, R01 GM065937-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gated gap junction channels are important cellular conduits for establishing and maintaining intercellular communication. The three-dimensional structure of a mutant human connexin 26 (Cx26M34A) by electron cryocrystallography revealed a plug-like density in the channel pore suggesting that physical blockage of the pore may be one mechanism of closure (Oshima et al. 2007, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 10034-10039). However, it remains to be determined what part of the sequence contributes to the plug. Here, we present the projection structure of an N-terminus deletion of Cx26M34A missing amino acids 2 to 7 (Cx26M34Adel2-7) crystallized in the same two-dimensional crystal form. A 10 angstrom resolution projection map of Cx26M34Adel2-7 revealed that the plug density was dramatically reduced in comparison with that found in full-length Cx26 channel. The difference map between the deletion and full-length Cx26M34A channels strongly suggests that the N-terminus of connexin contributes to the plug for the physical closure of gap junction channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available