4.4 Article

Molecular evolution of the dotA gene in Legionella pneumophila

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 21, Pages 6269-6277

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.21.6269-6277.2003

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molecular evolution of dotA, which is related to the virulence of Legionella pneumophila, was investigated by comparing the sequences of 15 reference strains (serogroups 1 to 15). It was found that dotA has a complex mosaic structure. The whole dotA gene of Legionella pneumophila subsp. pneumophila serogroups 2, 6, and 12 has been transferred from Legionella pneumophila subsp. fraseri. A discrepancy was found between the trees inferred from the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of dotA, which suggests that multiple hits, resulting in synonymous substitutions, have occurred. Gene phylogenies inferred from three different segments (the 5'-end region, the central, large periplasmic domain, and the 3'-end region) showed impressively dissimilar topologies. This was concordant with the sequence polymorphisms, indicating that each region has experienced an independent evolutionary history, and was evident even within the same domain of each strain. For example, the PP2 domain was found to have a heterogeneous structure, which led us hypothesize that the dotA gene of L. pneumophila may have originated from two or more different sources. Comparisons of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions demonstrated that the PP2 domain has been under strong selective pressure with respect to amino acid change. Split decomposition analysis also supported the intragenic recombination of dotA. Multiple recombinational exchange within the dotA gene, encoding an integral cytoplasmic membrane protein that is secreted, probably provided increased fitness in certain environmental niches, such as within a particular biofilm community or species of amoebae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available