4.7 Article

Side population keratinocytes resembling bone marrow side population stem cells are distinct from label-retaining keratinocyte stem cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 1095-1103

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12531.x

Keywords

ABC transporters; Hoechst 33342; integrins

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC010542, Z01BC010542] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Very primitive hematopoietic stem cells have been identified as side population cells based on their ability to efflux a fluorescent vital dye, Hoechst 33342. In this study we show that keratinocytes with the same side population phenotype are also present in the human epidermis. Although side population keratinocytes have the same dye-effluxing phenotype as bone marrow side population cells and can be blocked by verapamil, they do not express increased levels of the ABCG2 transporter that is believed to be responsible for the bone marrow side population phenotype. Because bone marrow side population cells have stem cell characteristics, we sought to determine if side population keratinocytes represent a keratinocyte stem cell population by comparing side population keratinocytes with a traditional keratinocyte stem cell candidate, label-retaining keratinocytes. Flow cytometric analyses demonstrated that side population keratinocytes have a different cell surface phenotype (low beta1 integrin and low alpha6 integrin expression) than label-retaining keratinocytes and represent a unique population of keratinocytes distinctly different from the traditional keratinocyte stem cell candidate. Future in vivo studies will be required to analyze the function of side population keratinocytes in epidermal homeostasis and to determine if side population keratinocytes have characteristics of keratinocyte stem cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available