4.3 Article

Deoxygenation-induced and Ca2+ dependent phosphatidylserine externalisation in red blood cells from normal individuals and sickle cell patients

Journal

CELL CALCIUM
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 51-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.10.005

Keywords

Sickle cell; Phosphatidylserine; Calcium affinity; Magnesium; Deoxygenation

Categories

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. BBSRC
  4. Medical Research Council [G0901177] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0901177] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphatidylserine (PS) is usually confined to the inner leaflet of the red blood cell (RBC) membrane. It may become externalised in various conditions, however, notably in RBCs from patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) where exposed PS may contribute to anaemic and ischaemic complications. PS externalisation requires both inhibition of the aminophospholipid translocase (or flippase) and activation of the scramblase. Both may follow from elevation of intracellular Ca2+. Flippase inhibition occurs at low [Ca2+](i), about 1 mu M, but [Ca2+](i) required for scrambling is reported to be much higher (around 100 mu M). In this work, FITC-labelled lactadherin and FACS were used to measure externalised PS, with [Ca2+](i) altered using bromo-A23187 and EGTA/Ca2+ mixtures. Two components of Ca2+-induced scrambling were apparent, of high (EC50 1.8 +/- 0.3 mu M) and low (306 +/- 123 mu M) affinity, in RBCs from normal individuals and the commonest SCD genotypes, HbSS and HbSC. The high affinity component was lost in the presence of unphysiologically high [Mg2+] but was unaffected by high K+ (90 mM) or vanadate (1 mM). The high affinity component accounted for PS scrambling in >= 2/3rd RBCs. It is likely to be most significant in vivo and may be involved in the pathophysiology of SCD or other conditions involving eryptosis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available