4.7 Article

Relationship between the dynamic geometry and wall thickness of a human coronary artery

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2260-2265

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000095976.40874.E0

Keywords

coronary arteries; dynamic geometry; wall thickness; biplane angiography; intravascular ultrasound

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL058856] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58856] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective - It is widely recognized that hemodynamic and wall mechanical forces are involved in the initiation and development of atherosclerosis. In the coronary vasculature, these forces are likely mediated by arterial dynamics and geometry. This research examines the hypothesis that coronary artery motion and geometry affect the local predisposition to disease, presumably through their influence on the stresses at and in the artery wall. Methods and Results - The dynamics of a human right coronary artery and the variation of wall thickness along its length were characterized from biplane cineangiograms and intravascular ultrasound records, respectively. The dynamic geometry parameters were distance along the vessel, cyclic displacement, axial strain, curvature, and torsion. Multiple regression analyses using principal components show that ( 1) no single dynamic geometry parameter has a dominant influence on wall thickness, ( 2) linear combinations of such parameters predict wall thickness measures with high confidence ( P < 0.001; R-2 between 0.17 and 0.44), and (3) both the time-average values of curvature and torsion and their excursion during the cardiac cycle are positively correlated with maximum wall thickness and cross-sectional asymmetry. Conclusions - The relationships seen here support the hypothesis that dynamic geometry plays a role in the localization of early coronary artery thickening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available