4.8 Article

A randomised placebo controlled trial of pegylated interferon alpha in active ulcerative colitis

Journal

GUT
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 1728-1733

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.12.1728

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Pilot studies of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) suggest a high remission rate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. We evaluated the safety of pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFN) and its role in induction of remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis, in a multicentre placebo controlled trial. Methods: Sixty patients with a clinical activity score (CAI) of >6 were randomised to receive placebo (n = 20), PegIFN 0.5 mug/kg (n = 19), or PegIFN 1.0 mug/kg body weight (n = 21) once weekly (PegIntron; Schering-Plough, USA) over 12 weeks. Patients receiving 5-aminosalicylates, steroids, and/or azathioprine in stable dosages were included. Results: Serious adverse events were seen in none of the placebo patients, in 3/19 patients in the PegIFN 0.5 mug/kg group (hospitalisation due to disease flare up n = 3), and in 3/21 in the PegIFN 1.0 mug/kg group ( hospitalisation due to disease flare up n = 1; thrombosis n = 1; grand mal seizure n = 1). Otherwise, we observed only minor IFN-alpha side effects. Clinical remission rates at week 12 (CAI less than or equal to4) were 7/20 (35%) in the placebo, 9/19 (47%) in the PegIFN 0.5 mug/kg group, and 7/21 (33%) in the PegIFN 1.0 mug/kg group (NS). Early withdrawal from the study was observed in 11/20 placebo patients, in 6/19 in the PegIFN 0.5 mug/kg group, and in 10/21 in the PegIFN 1.0 mug/kg group, mainly due to lack of efficacy. The higher PegIFN dose was associated with a significant decrease in levels of C reactive protein (p = 0.003, day 0 v 85). Conclusions: PegIFN is safe but not effective, at the dosages used, in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available