4.8 Article

GutenTag: High-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 75, Issue 23, Pages 6415-6421

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0347462

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R33CA081665] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR011823] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY013288] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA081665-04, R33 CA82665] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NCRR NIH HHS [RR11823-08, P41 RR011823-08, P41 RR011823] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY13288-03, R01 EY013288-03, R01 EY013288] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shotgun proteomics is a powerful tool for identifying the protein content of complex mixtures via liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The most widely used class of algorithms for analyzing mass spectra of peptides has been database search software such as SEQUEST. A new sequence tag database search algorithm, called GutenTag, makes it possible to identify peptides with unknown posttranslational modifications or sequence variations. This software automates the process of inferring partial sequence tags directly from the spectrum and efficiently examines a sequence database for peptides that match these tags. When multiple candidate sequences result from the database search, the software evaluates which is the best match by a rapid examination of spectral fragment ions. We compare GutenTag's accuracy to that of SEQUEST on a defined protein mixture, showing that both modified and unmodified peptides can be successfully identified by this approach. GutenTag analyzed 33 000 spectra from a human lens sample, identifying peptides that were missed in prior SEQUEST analysis due to sequence polymorphisms and posttranslational modifications. The software is available under license; visit http://fields.scripps.edu for information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available