4.3 Article

Measurements of mitochondrial pH in cultured cortical neurons clarify contribution of mitochondrial pore to the mechanism of glutamate-induced delayed Ca2+ deregulation

Journal

CELL CALCIUM
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 602-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.10.005

Keywords

glutamate; excitotoxicity; mitochondria; calcium deregulation; mitochondrial permeability transition

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS 050131] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Telethon [GGP05284] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To clarify the role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPT) in the mechanism of the glutamate-induced delayed calcium deregulation (DCD) and mitochondrial depolarization (MD), we studied changes in cytosolic (pH(m)) and mitochondrial pH (pH(c)) induced by glutamate in cultured cortical neurons expressing pH-sensitive fluorescent proteins. We found that DCD and MD were associated with a prominent pH(m) decrease which presumably resulted from MPT opening. This pH(m) decrease occurred with some delay after the onset of DCD and MD. This argued against the hypothesis that MPT opening plays a dominant role in triggering of DCD. This conclusion was also supported by experiments in which Ca2+ was replaced with antagonist of MPT opening Sr2+. We found that in Sr2+-containing medium glutamate-induced delayed strontium deregulation (DSD), similar to DCD, which was accompanied by a profound MD. Analysis of the changes in pH(c) and pH(m) associated with DSD led us to conclude that MD in Sr2+-containing medium occurred without involvement of the pore. In contrast, in Ca2+-containing medium such non-pore mechanism was responsible only for MD initiation while in the final stages of MD development the MPT played a major role. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available