4.5 Article

Control of the replicative life span of human fibroblasts by p16 and the polycomb protein Bmi-1

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 389-401

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.1.389-401.2003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R37AG009909, R01AG009909, R03AG016851, R56AG009909] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R37 AG009909, AG09909, AG16851] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The polycomb protein Bmi-1 represses the INK4a locus, which encodes the tumor suppressors p16 and p14(ARF). Here we report that Bmi-1 is downregulated when WI-38 human fibroblasts undergo replicative senescence, but not quiescence, and extends replicative life span when overexpressed. Life span extension by Bmi-1 required the pRb, but not p53, tumor suppressor protein. Deletion analysis showed that the RING finger and helix-turn-helix domains of Bmi-1 were required for life span extension and suppression of p16. Furthermore, a RING finger deletion mutant exhibited dominant negative activity, inducing p16 and premature senescence. Interestingly, presenescent cultures of some, but not all, human fibroblasts contained growth-arrested cells expressing high levels of p16 and apparently arrested by a p53- and telomere-independent mechanism. Bmi-1 selectively extended the life span of these cultures. Low O-2 concentrations had no effect on p16 levels or life span extension by Bmi-1 but reduced expression of the p53 target, p21. We propose that some human fibroblast strains are more sensitive to stress-induced senescence and have both p16-dependent and p53/telomere-dependent pathways of senescence. Our data suggest that Bmi-1 extends the replicative life span of human fibroblasts by suppressing the p16-dependent senescence pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available