4.4 Article

Retinoic acid induces myoblasts transdifferentiation into premeiotic Stra8-positive cells

Journal

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 365-372

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/CBI20100610

Keywords

C2C12 myoblast; embryonic carcinoma cell; retinoic acid; spermatogenesis; Stra8; transdifferentiation

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [30871786]
  2. Foundation for New Technology and Methods [2008ZX08010-001]
  3. Major Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 plan) [2009CB941002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spermatogonia and sperm-like cells can be derived in vitro via the addition of RA (retinoic acid) to pluripotent ES and EG cells. At present, however, these cells have not been derived from unipotent cells. Here, we have generated premeiotic Stra8-positive cells from 02012 myoblasts following treatment with 10 mu M all-trans-RA for 8 days. The differentiated 02012 cells exhibited spherical morphology similar to spermatogonia, and they expressed gene markers of premeiosis, meiosis and postmeiosis. In addition, some of the transdifferentiated Stra8-positive cells had a tail-like phenotype. Flow cytometry results indicated that up to 20% of RA-induced 02012 cells were Stra8-positive. Mvh (mouse vasa homologue) protein, a germ cell-specific ATP-dependent RNA helicase and Prm1 (protamine 1) were detected in transdifferentiated cells. The DNA content in induced 02012 cells showed that Stra8-positive cells were diploid, suggesting that the myoblast transdifferentiation was in the premeiotic stage of spermatogenesis. The derivation of Stra8-positive cells from 02012 myoblasts has important implications for studying unipotent cell differentiation. Furthermore, C2C12 myoblasts may provide a useful in vitro cell model to study signal transduction and transdifferentiation during RA treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available