4.5 Article

Nucleotide excision repair- and polymerase eta-mediated error-prone removal of mitomycin C interstrand cross-links

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 754-761

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.2.754-761.2003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA091029, CA75160, CA76172, R01 CA075160, P30 CA016672, CA91029, R01 CA076172, R29 CA076172] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA091029, R29CA076172, R01CA076172, R01CA075160, P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interstrand cross-links (ICLs) make up a unique class of DNA lesions in which both strands of the double helix are covalently joined, precluding strand opening during replication and transcription. The repair of DNA ICLs has become a focus of study since ICLs are recognized as the main cytotoxic lesion inflicted by an array of alkylating compounds used in cancer treatment. As is the case for double-strand breaks, a damage-free homologous copy is essential for the removal of ICLs in an error-free manner. However, recombination-independent mechanisms may exist to remove ICLs in an error-prone fashion. We have developed an in vivo reactivation assay that can be used to examine the removal of site-specific mitomycin C-mediated ICLs in mammalian cells. We found that the removal of the ICL from the reporter substrate could take place in the absence of undamaged homologous sequences in repair-proficient cells, suggesting a cross-link repair mechanism that is independent of homologous recombination. Systematic analysis of nucleotide excision repair mutants demonstrated the involvement of transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and a partial requirement for the lesion bypass DNA polymerase M encoded by the human POLH gene. From these observations, we propose the existence of a recombination-independent and mutagenic repair pathway for the removal of ICLs in mammalian cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available