4.7 Article

The importance of volcanic emissions for the global atmospheric mercury cycle

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 36, Pages 5115-5124

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.07.011

Keywords

mercury; degassing; volcanic; pollution; heavy metal; emissions inventories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mercury is a highly volatile, bioaccumulating toxic trace metal with a long (similar to1 yr) atmospheric residence time. Hg is strongly enriched in volcanic emanations, and volcanoes are the only natural sources of direct Hg emission to the free troposphere and stratosphere. However, there is considerable uncertainty over the annual emission rate of mercury from volcanoes. Previous estimates, based on limited measurements from volcanic plumes, span three orders of magnitude (similar to 10(0)-10(3) Mg Hg/yr), or from <1% to similar to50% of total natural Hg emissions. Here we critically evaluate published data from volcanic plumes, and combine this with information from natural archives to show unequivocally the significance of volcanoes for the global biogeochemical mercury cycle. 'Low' global volcanic flux estimates (< similar to50 Mg/yr) are based on the inappropriate extrapolation of data from low-temperature fumarolic degassing at non-erupting volcanoes to the high-temperature emissions from active volcanoes. Based on data from active volcanoes, we estimate that the time-averaged volcanic Hg emission is similar to700 Mg/yr, or 20-40% of total natural emissions. Continuous degassing accounts for only similar to10% of this flux, while 75% of volcanic Hg is released during 'smaller' sporadic eruptions (< 10-10(2) Mg/event). Rare, large (> 10(3) Mg) explosive eruptions overwhelm the total atmospheric burden several times per century, and account for similar to15% of total volcanic Hg emissions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available